INVESTINGBIGMONEY.COM

capital management without - www.investingbigmoney.com

Menu


body. For the first two years after such approval, the credit risk element of capital allocation cannot be lower than 90% of the allocation calculated under the foundation approach; after two years the BIS propose to review the advanced approach and comment.


EXHIBIT 14.5 Capital Requirements under Specified PD Bands

Credit Rating PD Band Basel I Standard Approach IRB Foundation

Operational Risk

One of the most controversial elements of the Basel II is the new capital charge to cover banks operational risk. The Committee has proposed three different approaches for calculating the operational risk capital charge. These are:

■ the basic indicator approach, under which a 20% of total capital would be allocated;

■ a standardized approach, under which different risk indicators will be allocated to different lines of business within a bank; this would be the level of average assets for a retail bank and assets under management for a fund manager. The Committee would set the capital charge level for each business line in accordance with its perceived level of risk in each national jurisdiction, and the total operational risk would be the sum of the exposures of all business lines;

■ an internal estimation by a bank of the expected losses due to opera- tional risk for each business lines. Operational risk here would be risk of loss as a result of fraud, IT failures, legal risk, and so on.

Total Minimum Capital

The sum of the capital calculation for credit risk exposure, operational risk and the banks trading book will be the total minimum capital requirement. This capital requirement will be expressed as a 8% risk- asset ratio, identical to the rules under Basel I.

Pillar 2-Supervisory Approach

A new element of the Basel II accord is the requirement for a supervision approach to capital allocation. This is based on three principles. First,

banks must have a procedure for calculating their capital requirements in accordance with their individual risk profile. This means they are required to look beyond the minimum capital requirement as provided for under Pillar 1, and assess specific risk areas that reflect their own business activi- ties. This method would consider for instance, interest rate risk exposure within the banking book, or prepayment risk as part of mortgage business. These procedures will be reviewed constantly by banking supervisory